Legal Opinion
California Highway Commission v. Ballard
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 10, 1926No. Docket No. 3104PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
This cause is before us upon a petition filed by the California Highway Commission seeking a writ of mandate directing and commanding the respondent, T. H. Ballard, as the auditor of the county of Modoc, to draw his warrant upon a special fund of the county of Modoc, designated as the highway improvement fund of said county, for the transfer from said fund of the sum of $40,000 to be deposited in the proper funds of the state treasury, to be used by the California Highway Commission in improvement of a certain 3.7 miles of highway in the county of Modoc.
On the first day of July, 1919, an…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- People ex rel. Blanding v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Conlin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- O'Farrell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Reed Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Pine Tree Lumber Co. v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. New Jersey Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- City of San Diego v. MillanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- In Re MartinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- O'Keefe v. Atascadero County Sanitation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Board of Ed. of Independent School Dist. No. 93 v. DixsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.