Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Daprato

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 17, 2003No. 348, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Justice.

In this case of first impression we are asked to decide whether a “household” exclusion found in a personal liability umbrella policy that includes excess automobile liability coverage is repugnant to Delaware’s Financial Responsibility Laws. Further, we examine whether the trial judge, by granting the claimant summary judgment, misapplied our decision in Nationwide v. Seeman. 1

We hold that the public policy embraced by Delaware’s Financial Responsibility Laws does not invalidate the unambiguous household exclusion found in this claimant’s State Farm personal liability…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oberly v. KirbySupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  2. Grand Ventures, Inc. v. WhaleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WagamonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  4. Judge v. RagoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  5. Nationwide General Insurance Co. v. SeemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fisher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State Farm Mutual AutomobileSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. MarleyKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. MarleyKentucky Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API