Legal Opinion

Nationwide General Insurance Co. v. Seeman

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 14, 1997No. 127, 1997PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment for plaintiff entered by the Superior Court. The defendant-appellant is Nationwide General Insurance Company (“Nationwide”). The plaintiff-appellee is Daniel W. Seeman (“Seeman”). Seeman is insured under a policy of automobile liability insurance issued to him by Nationwide.

Seeman filed a declaratory judgment action seeking to invalidate a provision in his insurance policy with Nationwide. That provision limited the maximum liability coverage for injuries to a member of the insured’s household to $15,000, the minimum amount required…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Immer v. RiskoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  2. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WagamonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  4. Hudson v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  5. Schneider v. CoeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stearman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Progressive Northern Insurance v. MohrSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  3. Berns v. DoanSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DapratoSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WilsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API