Legal Opinion

United States v. Homer Lee Tucker

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 29, 1993No. 87-5090PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Chief Judge:

We are called upon in this appeal to consider the limits on our supervisory powers. Tucker contends that we have the power and obligation to reverse his criminal conviction and dismiss the indictment against him because of excessive delay in hearing his appeal due to the failure of a court reporter to file a transcript of his trial in a timely manner. We hold that we may not exercise our supervisory powers absent a showing of prejudice. Because Tucker has not met this burden, we withdraw the panel opinion and affirm his conviction.

I

A federal grand jury indicted Tucker and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Jerome Gatto, Virgil Redmond, Joseph Bonanno, Jr., and Salvatore BonannoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Harris v. ChampionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. BermeaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. BermeaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API