Legal Opinion

Deal v. Excise Board of Pontotoc County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 26, 1937No. 26225PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

This case originated in the district court of Pontotoc county, and is an appeal from the judgment of said court in favor of defendant in error, the excise board of the county of Pontotoc, against the plaintiff in error, C. S. Deal, denying the said plaintiff in error a writ of mandamus and the relief sought therein. Por convenience we shall refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court, that is, the plaintiff in error as plaintiff and the defendant in error as defendant.

The plaintiff was the duly qualified and acting justice of the peace for Ada district, for the quarter ending…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Faught v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Sinclair Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Board Cty. Com'rs Okmulgee Cty. v. JennessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Baylis v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Baylis v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API