Legal Opinion

Sinclair Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Tulsa County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 18, 1935No. 25116PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.

This is an appeal from A judgment of the Court of Tax Review as to certain tax levies for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1982, Tulsa county. Protestant and protestee both appealed from judgments as to certain levies.

The protestant contends that the Court of Tax Review erred in failing to find that the county had failed to set up as a surplus in its general fund the sum of $17,-630 81. It is alleged that the county excise board used a surpus of $645.22 when it had a surplus of $18,282.03 and failed to use $17,636.81 surplus to reduce the ad valorem taxation for 1932 33. It is shown that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Faught v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Eaton v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Protest of Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. In Re Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, Chickasha, Oklahoma v. NathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Seminole County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Oklahoma City v. Green Construction Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Choctaw County Excise Board v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  5. Schuman v. Board of Com'rs of Muskogee CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API