Legal Opinion
Harrison v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided November 1, 2006No. PD-1193-04PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.
in which KELLER, P.J., WOMACK, HERVEY, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.
Holding that the State failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Mary Elizabeth Harrison voluntarily consented to provide a urine specimen, the court of appeals reversed the trial court’s denial of Harrison’s motion to suppress.1 We con-elude that the court of appeals erred by so holding.
Facts and Procedural History
While driving in the City of Arlington on the afternoon of August 8, 2002, Vickie Evans called 911 to report that Harrison was driving while intoxicated or was having a seizure. As she continued to…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by67 opinions
- Valtierra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Gutierrez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Ramirez-Tamayo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Fienen, Casey RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Maxwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.