Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 30, 1985No. F004794PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT. *

Appellant was convicted on his nolo contendere pleas of three counts of lewd and lascivious acts upon or with the body of a child under age 14. The trial court sentenced appellant to prison for the eight-year upper base term on count XXIV, plus consecutive terms of one year, eight months on counts IX and XIV. Appellant contends 1) that the statute of limitations barred his convictions on counts IX and XIV; 2) that the trial court erred in computing his consecutive term on count IX. Respondent disputes the statute of limitations point but concedes that the consecutive…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. ChaddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. PadfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. People v. JeromeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. MendezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. BargeronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. People v. VoitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. RocheleauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API