Legal Opinion

People v. Jerome

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1984No. Crim. 13081PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPARKS, J.

In this appeal we consider the doctrine of legal impossibility in a case where the defendant was convicted of the crime of “oral copulation with another person who is under 14 years of age” but the victim was 15 years old. (Pen. Code, § 288a, subd. (c).)

Defendant entered a negotiated plea of guilty before the magistrate to charges of forcible rape (§ 261, subd. (2)), and oral copulation of a minor under 14 (§ 288a, subd. (c)). He also admitted the allegation that he previously had been convicted of forcible rape (§ 667.6, subd. (a)). He was certified to the superior court for…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. ChaddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. People v. MutchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. LuceroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. MendezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. ArwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. People v. MeniusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. People v. RabyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API