Legal Opinion

People v. Padfield

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1982No. Crim. 11643PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPARKS, J.

In this case we consider whether the statute of limitations is waived by a plea of nolo contendere. We are also called upon to decide whether the denial of pretrial diversion is reviewable on appeal after such a plea. We hold that the statute of limitations is waived by that plea when, as here, the accusatory pleading properly alleges that the statute has been tolled. We further conclude that the diversion issue is cognizable on appeal after a plea of nolo contendere.

Defendant Robert J. Padfield appeals from a judgment (order of probation) entered after he entered a plea of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. People v. DeVaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. ChaddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. ZamoraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Stephens v. ToomeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Cowan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Davis v. Municipal Court for San Francisco Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. People v. ArwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API