Wiggins v. Piver
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The plaintiff seeks to hold the defendant financially responsible for injury and damage she alleges resulted from his negligent surgical treatment. She does not allege a lack of professional learning, skill or ability to perform the operation. Starnes v. Taylor, 272 N.C. 386, 158 S.E. 2d 339; Belk v. Schweizer, 268 N.C. 50, 149 S.E. 2d 565; Galloway v. Lawrence, 266 N.C. 245, 145 S.E. 2d 861; Hunt v. Bradshaw, 242 N.C. 517, 88 S.E. 2d 762; Nash v. Royster, 189 N.C. 408, 127 S.E. 356. She does allege, however, the defendant was negligent: (1) By attempting to close incisions of such length…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Sims ex rel. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Hunt v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Insurance Co. v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ardoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Hall v. HilbunMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- Morrison v. MacNamaraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Wall v. StoutSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Shilkret v. Annapolis Emergency Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.