Legal Opinion
Seybold v. Francis P. Dean, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 24, 1986No. Civ. A. 83-137PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHILL, Chief Judge.
Presently before us is Plaintiff’s “Petition to Allow Attorney’s Fees, Expenses and Costs” pursuant to § 2310(d)(2) of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty — Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 2301-2312 (1976) (“MMA”). Plaintiff initiated the underlying action on January 19, 1983 seeking damages for alleged uncorrected defects in his 1982 Peugeot 505 Turbo Diesel Sedan.
Background
The Complaint alleged diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), and set forth three counts based on New Jersey law: (1) revocation of acceptance under § 2-608 of the New Jersey…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Smith v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hardin v. Manitowoc-Forsythe Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Lentino v. Fringe Employee Plans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United Industries, Inc. v. Simon-Hartley, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Adamar of New Jersey, Inc. v. August (In Re August)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Hawkins v. Ford Motor Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- Chavis v. Fidelity Warranty Services, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
- Morse/Diesel, Inc. v. Trinity Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.