Legal Opinion

Chavis v. Fidelity Warranty Services, Inc.

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided February 13, 2006No. C/A1:05CV1813MBSPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER and OPINION

SEYMOUR, District Judge.

On May 23, 2005, named Plaintiffs Oliver and Annette Chavis filed this action in the Court of Common Pleas for Barnwell County, South Carolina on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant Fidelity Warranty Services charged and received premiums on automobile warranties in violation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (the “M/M Act”). See 15 U.S.C. § 2310(d)(3). On June 23, 2005, Defendant removed the case to federal court alleging jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). 1

This matter is now before the court on…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. United States v. Richard LangleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  4. Custer v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  5. Catherine Gardynski-Leschuck v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Weisblum v. Prophase Labs, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
  3. Johansson v. Central Garden & Pet Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
  4. Stella v. LVMH Perfumes and Cosmetics USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  5. Pierre v. Planet Automotive, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API