Legal Opinion
Hardin v. Manitowoc-Forsythe Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 5, 1982No. Nos. 80-1522, 80-1562PublishedCited by 289 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, Darel Hardin, appeals from a judgment entered by the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in a diversity case. Plaintiff brought this products liability suit, naming Manitowoc-Forsythe Corp. and Columbus-McKinnon Corp. as defendants, to recover for injuries he sustained in an on-the-job accident allegedly caused by a defectively designed push-pull jack. Plaintiff’s employer, Combustion Engineering, was of course immune from suit under the Kansas workmen’s compensation law.
Combustion Engineering leased a Manitowoc crane from a wholly-owned…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Brown v. KeillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- Kennedy v. City of SawyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- deHaas v. Empire Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by289 opinions
- Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Patsy Ayala, and Donna M. Ayala v. The United States of America, Patsy Ayala v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Warnick v. CooleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Beaubouef v. Beaubouef (In Re Beaubouef)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
284 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.