Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Banister Pipeline AM

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 8, 1987No. WCB 82-10103; CA A38048PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*336NEWMAN, J.

Claimant petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that denied his aggravation claim for hospitalization and treatment resulting from his attempted suicide. Respondents cross-petition from the portion of the order that granted claimant benefits for his right shoulder condition. On the petition, we reverse; on the cross-petition, we affirm.

Claimant suffered compensable knee and back injuries in September, 1980, when he slipped and fell backward in the bed of a truck. He filed a claim for the injury to his knee. He was awarded temporary total disability and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Saunders v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Grace v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Scheidemantel v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. McGill v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ahn v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Sullivan v. Banister Pipeline AmericanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Sullivan v. Banister Pipeline AMCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API