Richardson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Commissioner.
This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of burglary with the intent to commit theft. Upon appellant’s plea of guilty before the court, punishment was assessed at four years.
Court-appointed counsel has filed a brief wherein he recites that after examination of the record, he finds the appeal to be “wholly frivolous and can find no real grounds for appeal.” Attached to the brief is an acknowledgment of receipt of a copy of the brief by appellant stating that he has examined the same as well as the record in the case and approves of the statements contained…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gainous v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Soto v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Waage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Holder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
3Cited by6 opinions
- Salazar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Hayden v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
- Allsup v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.