Legal Opinion

Salazar v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 9, 2002No. 0045-01PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · CochranCochran, J.

joined by KELLER, P.J., MEYERS, PRICE, JOHNSON, KEASLER, HERVEY, and HOLCOMB, JJ.

Appellant Albert Salazar was found guilty of five counts of molesting the younger brother and sister of a teenager to whom he gave music lessons. The court of appeals reversed one of the counts — that of aggravated sexual assault of the little boy — because it found that the only evidence of the assault was Mr. Salazar’s extrajudicial confession, which he repudiated at trial. 1 This, the court of appeals held, rendered the evidence insufficient under the corpus delicti rule which requires that an…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Warszower v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Self v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. Duncan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by135 opinions

  1. Carrizales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  2. Bollinger v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2007
  3. Weaver v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  4. Miller, Christopher AdrianCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Herrero v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API