Legal Opinion

Hayden v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided October 24, 1991No. 13-91-090-CR, 13-91-091-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

Appellant pleaded guilty to the charges of burglary of a habitation and credit card abuse. Punishment was assessed at ten years’ confinement for each offense, to run concurrently. He now complains of insufficient evidence to support his guilty plea, abuse of discretion by the trial court in denying appellant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilt, and ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

In his first point of error, appellant contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his plea of guilty. In Texas, a plea of guilty must be supported by sufficient…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Moon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Coronado v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  2. Munoz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
  3. Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  4. Durst v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1995
  5. Cano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API