Legal Opinion

McCray v. Rosenkrance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 2001No. 25905PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIDWELL, Justice.

This appeal is from an order of the SRBA district court, adopting the recommendation of a special master in its entirety. The special master’s recommendation concluded that the majority of water rights 34-00600 and 34-000606 had been abandoned and/or forfeited due to non-use for the statutory period.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A Facts

Water rights 34-00600 and 34-00606 are appurtenant to real property previously owned and farmed by Gerald “Doug” Storer. Storer farmed the property (Storer property) between 1973 and 1984. The source of the water rights is Alder Creek, which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. PeiperIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Jenkins v. State, Dept. of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Post Falls Trailer Park v. FredekindIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Rodriguez v. Oakley Valley Stone, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Seccombe v. WeeksIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Smith v. MittonIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Akers v. D.L. White Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Neider v. ShawIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Sagewillow, Inc. v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. C & G, Inc. v. Canyon Highway District No. 4Idaho Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API