Legal Opinion

State v. Abel

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1965PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

Defendant has appealed from a judgment of conviction of the crime of forgery. The indictment charged that on June 3,1963, he forged the name of Francis A. Krouse to a check for $50 drawn on the First National Bank of Oregon, Medford Branch, and made payable to “Big Y Shopping Center.”

The defendant’s brief contains 12 assignments of error, only two of which are based on objections or requests for rulings properly and timely made by counsel at. the trial. Nevertheless, it is claimed by counsel for defendant that this court is “required” to review these alleged errors “to guarantee due process…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dick v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Harold L. Peek, Jr., and Susanna E. Peek v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  3. State of Oregon v. NodineOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State v. BraleyOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. AventOregon Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. HickmannOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. KesslerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. North v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1969

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API