North v. Cupp
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.
Petitioner was convicted in 1963 of the crime of using' explosives to commit a crime in a building entered in the nighttime. ① He was apprehended in the basement of a bank building. A search of his automobile produced incriminating evidence. The search was made six days after petitioner’s arrest and without a warrant. There can be little doubt that the search and seizure was in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The evidence found in the car was introduced by the state without objection at petitioner’s 1963 trial. An unsuccessful appeal was taken from his conviction, but no error was assigned…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Palmer v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MarshOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Eklof v. StewardOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. FairOregon Supreme Court · 1972
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.