Legal Opinion
Vicuna v. O.P. Schuman & Sons, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 14, 2015No. 13-CV-2834 (ERK)(VVP)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM & ORDER
KORMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Federica Vicuna and Martin Varelas brought this action against O.P. Schuman & Sons, Inc. (“Schuman”), S.K.S. Equipment Co. (“S.K.S.”), and AmeriPak Inc. alleging claims sounding in strict product liability, failure to provide proper warnings, breach of express and implied warranties, and negligence based on a workplace injury Vicuna sustained while using a machine manufactured by S.K.S. Schuman, the only remaining defendant, has moved for summary judgment on the plaintiffs’ successor liability and failure to warn claims.
BACKGROUND
A.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Delaware & Hudson Railway Company v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Krumme v. WestPoint Stevens Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vicuna v. O.P. Schuman & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017