Legal Opinion
Vicuna v. O.P. Schuman & Sons, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 31, 2017No. 13–cv–2834–ERKPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKorman, District Judge
Plaintiffs Federica Vicuna and her husband Martin Varelas bring this action against S.K.S. Equipment Co. ("S.K.S."), AmeriPak, Inc. ("AmeriPak"), and O.P. Schuman & Sons, Inc. ("Schuman"). Plaintiffs allege numerous claims sounding in products liability based on a workplace injury that plaintiff Vicuna sustained while using a machine that S.K.S. manufactured under its AmeriPak brand name. S.K.S. is now a defunct company. Schuman has purchased much of the assets once under the control of S.K.S., including the AmeriPak brand name.
There are currently four motions pending. First, the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Nikitas Amorgianos v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bulgari v. BulgariDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Candelaria v. Conopco, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Connecticut Fair Housing Ctr v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- DHIP, LLC v. Fifth Third BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Dill v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.