Legal Opinion
Murnick v. Board of Educ.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 24, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
235 N.J. Super. 225 (1989)
561 A.2d 1193
THEODORE R. MURNICK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF ASBURY PARK, PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF ASBURY PARK, MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASBURY PARK AND THE CITY OF ASBURY PARK, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION, INTERVENOR-DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 15, 1989.
Decided July 24, 1989.
Before Judges GAULKIN, R.S. COHEN and A.M. STEIN.
Gita F. Rothschild argued the cause for appellant (McCarter & English, attorneys; Alfred L. Ferguson, of counsel; Gita F.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rutgers v. PilusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Roman Catholic Diocese of Newark v. Ho-Ho-Kus BoroughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- Roman Catholic Diocese of Newark v. Ho-Ho-Kus BoroughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Township Committee of Denville v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Board of Education v. MurnickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
3Cited by3 opinions
- Board of Education v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- Board of Educ. v. Zon. Bd. of Adj.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1991