Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided May 6, 1991Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Wanda Northcutt State Representative P.O. Box 350 Stuttgart, Arkansas 72160-0350

Dear Representative Northcutt:

This is in response to your request for an opinion on whether a public school district is subject to city zoning ordinances.

It is my opinion that the answer to your question will have to be determined based upon the facts of an individual case, in light of the specific exercise of power exerted and the legislative intent expressed on the particular question. No broad-sweeping rule may be declared as the law on this question.

You have noted that the counsel for a local…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Rutgers v. PilusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  2. City of Fargo, Cass Cty. v. Harwood TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. City of Temple Terrace v. HILLSBOROUGH ASS'N, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. Lauderdale County Board of Education v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. Blackstone Park Improvement Ass'n v. State Board of Standards & AppealsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API