Legal Opinion

Roman Catholic Diocese of Newark v. Ho-Ho-Kus Borough

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 24, 1964PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Weintraub, C. J.

This is a zoning case. In October 1960 plaintiff, Roman Catholic Diocese of Newark, purchased a parcel of some 20 acres in the most highly restricted residence district (R-l) of the Borough of Ho-Ho-Kus upon which it *559intended to erect a regional high school for some 1,500 boys. At the time of the purchase, the zoning ordinance permitted the contemplated use, but plaintiff’s plans led to a reconsideration of the ordinance and finally to an amendment which barred all schools from the R-l district but continued to permit public and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Diocese of Rochester v. Planning BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. St. John's Roman Catholic Church Corp. v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  3. Tustin Heights Assn. v. BD. OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Town of Atherton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. City of Miami Beach v. State Ex Rel. LearSupreme Court of Florida · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. TAXPAYERS ASSN. OF WEYMOUTH TP. INC. v. Weymouth Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  2. NJ Sports & Exposition Auth. v. McCraneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  3. So. Burl. Cty. NAACP v. Tp. of Mt. LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  4. Austin Independent School District v. City of Sunset ValleyTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Board of Education v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API