Legal Opinion

United States v. Lawrence J. Conversano and William P. Keohan. Lawrence J. Conversano

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 15, 1969No. 17372PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GANEY, Circuit Judge.

Defendant, Lawrence J. Conversano, and William Patrick Keohan were charged in a single two-count indictment with transferring and having in their possession and concealing counterfeited obligations of the United States, with intent to defraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 472 and 473. Keohan plead guilty to both charges while defendant plead not guilty. At his trial, defendant raised the defense of entrapment, took the stand and called Keohan, a co-defendant, as a witness. On the testimony presented by Secret Service Agent Kenneth E. Balge, the only…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. Kenneth LandryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  5. Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. William Christopher Twigg, Iii, United States of America v. Henry Alfred NevilleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. CastroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Leonard Watson A/K/A 'Step'Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  4. State v. McNultyHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  5. United States v. PhiferDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API