Legal Opinion

State v. McNulty

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1978No. 5978PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

RICHARDSON, C.J.

Defendant-appellant, Donald Angus McNulty, appeals from a judgment of conviction for murder and from an order denying his motion for new trial.

We affirm.

On February 21, 1975, appellant was charged with committing the offense of murder in violation of HRS § 707-701 (1976). The indictment that followed alleged that on or about February 19, 1974, appellant “intentionally or knowingly” shot and killed Dion Yancey Cagle. On the basis of appellant’s indigency, private counsel was appointed to undertake his defense.

A jury trial was initiated on June 16, 1975.…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Rudy Notaro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  3. Commonwealth v. ColandroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. United States v. Clifford JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Kenneth LandryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State v. AcostaWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. HolbronHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Briones v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. FurutaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. AntoneHawaii Supreme Court · 1980

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API