Legal Opinion

Glaser v. Schroeder

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 27, 1929PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRttgg, C.J.

This is an action of tort whereby the plaintiff seeks to recover compensation for damage to his property alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant with respect to his automobile. Findings of fact were made by the trial judge to the effect that the defendant placed his automobile in a street in New Bedford on a grade so that its rear wheels were a little distance from the curb and on a lower level than the forward wheels, which were turned toward the curb, put on the emergency brake and left the automobile. Before he returned, his sister and a friend, who had accompanied…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lonergan v. American Railway Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Reardon v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Ryan v. Fall River Iron Works Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Loanes v. GastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Washburn v. R. F. Owens Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Taylor v. GoldsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  4. Fone v. ElloianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Cushing v. JollesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API