Lynn v. Knob Hill Improvement Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The default of the defendant for failing to answer or demur to the complaint within the time prescribed by law was duly entered on May 19, 1914. On the following day the defendant served on the plaintiff a notice of motion to be relieved from said default, on the ground that it was taken through his mistake, inadvertence, and excusable neglect. - This motion was denied on October 1, 1914. On October 29, 1914, at the instance of plaintiff, the court entered judgment against said defendant for $678 and costs. The defendant appeals from the judgment, and also from the order denying its motion to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Estate of WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- White v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Herzog v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe R.R.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Kaiser v. BarronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by12 opinions
- DeWITT v. GlazierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Lemle v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Standard Livestock Co. v. PentzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Employees' Participating Assn. v. PineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Ross v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.