Legal Opinion

Freund v. DeBuse

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1973PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The plaintiff alleged he was injured when the car he was driving was struck in the rear by defendant’s pickup. The defendant testified the collision occurred because his brakes unexpectedly failed. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant and plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff contends the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that the defendant was liable. The basis of plaintiff’s motion was that the defendant was negligent per se because his brakes were not “adequate to control the movement of and to stop and hold such [his] vehicle” and his brakes were not “maintained in good…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barnum v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. McConnell v. HerronOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Nettleton v. JAMESOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Ainsworth v. DeutschmanOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Pozsgai v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. James v. Carnation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Cutsforth v. KINZUA CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Stevens v. Wood Sawmill, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Jones v. Mitchell Bros. Truck LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Harkins v. DoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API