Legal Opinion

Ainsworth v. Deutschman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1968PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The principal issues upon appeal arise from the plaintiff being injured as a result of defective brakes in the vehicle of defendants Deutschman.

The defendant Roy Deutschman owned a 1959 Thunderbird which was operated by his wife, defendant Gloria Deutschman. Defendant Hamlin Motor Company bought the car used in 1963 and sold it to one Fields. Fields sold it to the Deutschmans about three months later. The accident occurred after the Deutschmans owned the car about six months. The plaintiff was riding in a vehicle on a through street. Mrs.' Deutschman was approaching the through street on an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fenton v. AleshireOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Hills v. McGillvreyOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. McConnell v. HerronOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Blake v. Roy Webster OrchardsOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Nettleton v. JAMESOregon Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Cutsforth v. KINZUA CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Ballard v. Rickabaugh Orchards, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Evans v. General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Freund v. DeBuseOregon Supreme Court · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API