Legal Opinion
Berryman v. Bonaparte
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 23, 1932No. 20421PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.
Four separate suits were instituted in the district court of OMahoma county, Okla., on the same day. Each of these suits was brought for the recovery of an alleged illegal tax made for the city of Oklahoma City for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 19218'. B. B. Bonaparte, county treasurer of Oklahoma county, was the defendant in each case. There are two questions of law involved in each case. The first one is the same in each and will only be stated in the first case. The second proposition will only be stated in the other cases'. They are as follows:
District court case No. 55512, C. T.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mockowik v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Stumpf v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Pitts v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Grubb v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Perrine v. Bonaparte, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Carlton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Jepeway v. BarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- St. Louis-S. F. R. v. Choctaw County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.