Legal Opinion

M.K. Associates v. Stowell Products, Inc.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided October 18, 1988No. Civ. 87-0270 PPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

GENE CARTER, District Judge.

I. Introduction

M.K. Associates, a seller of wood products, has brought an action to recover the remainder of the purchase price due from a sale of ash dowels to the defendant Stowell Products, Inc. The defendant claims that the plaintiff breached the contract because the dowels were defective. The defendant argues that it is entitled to set off the remaining amount due as damages caused by the defective goods.

The case was tried before the court on September 19, 1988. For the reasons set forth below, the court finds for the plaintiff.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Standard Alliance Industries, Inc. v. Black Clawson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  2. Pace v. Sagebrush Sales Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Custom Automated MacHinery v. Penda Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  4. Intervale Steel v. Borg & Beck Div., Borg-WarnerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
  5. In Re Morweld Steel Products Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Muehlbauer v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  2. P & F Construction Corp. v. Friend Lumber Corp. of MedfordMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  3. American Aerial Services, Inc. v. Terex USA, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2014
  4. Footprint International LLC v. Footprint Asia LimitedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  5. Khan v. Walmart Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API