Legal Opinion
Intervale Steel v. Borg & Beck Div., Borg-Warner
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 9, 1984No. Civ. A. 81-71079PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
PHILIP PRATT, District Judge.
This case involves the application of the Uniform Commercial Code, adopted by Michigan, M.C.L.A. § 440.1101 et seq., to the sale of steel by plaintiff to the defendant. 1 The plaintiff, Intervale Steel Corporation (Intervale) is the successor to Barry Steel Corporation (Barry) and sold 22 coils of steel to the defendant Borg & Beck (Borg), a division of Borg-Warner Corporation. The latter has refused to remit the purchase price and this suit ensued.
I. FACTS
Barry had sold steel to Borg for over 15 years. During most if not all…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Fargo MacHine & Tool Co. v. Kearney & Trecker Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
- Created Gemstones, Inc. v. Union Carbide Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- S C Gray, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- GNP Commodities, Inc. v. Walsh Heffernan Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- McGrady v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Deere & Company v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Barry & Sewall Industrial Supply Co., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Metal-Prep of Houston, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Charles Farley v. Country Coach IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Piezo Crystal Co. v. Uddeholm Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- M.K. Associates v. Stowell Products, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.