Legal Opinion
Custom Automated MacHinery v. Penda Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 20, 1982No. 79 C 1755, 79 C 3078PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
ASPEN, District Judge:
This cause having come on trial and the Court, having considered the evidence, oral arguments, and the briefs of the parties, does hereby make and enter, pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Any finding of fact which is properly a conclusion of law and any conclusion of law which is properly a finding of fact is to be so considered.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Custom Automated Machinery (“Custom”) is an operating division of Custom Aluminum Products, Inc., an Illinois…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murray v. Holiday Rambler, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Adams v. J. I. Case Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970
- Aes Technology Systems, Inc. v. Coherent RadiationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- V-M Corporation v. Bernard Distributing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Murray v. Kleen Leen, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lefebvre Intergraphics, Inc. v. Sanden MacHine Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Bishop Logging Co. v. John Deere Industrial Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- Intrastate Piping & Controls, Inc. v. Robert-James Sales, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Harbor House Condominium Ass'n v. Massachusetts Bay InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Horizons, Inc. v. Avco Corp.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.