Legal Opinion

Pace v. Sagebrush Sales Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1977No. 12684PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

This is an appeal from two orders of the trial court granting a motion for summary judgment to the plaintiff, Sagebrush Sales Company (hereinafter referred to as “Sagebrush”), and denying Milton Pace and Truck City Lumber (hereinafter referred to as “Pace”), the defendants, their motion for a new trial. We have jurisdiction of this appeal pursuant to 17A A.R.S. Rules of the Supreme Court, rule 47(e)(5).

This dispute arose out of a sale of lumber made by Jack Hubbard acting as an agent for Sagebrush, a New Mexico corporation and wholesale lumber supply dealer, doing business in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nielson v. FlashbergArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Savoca Masonry Co., Inc. v. Homes & Son Const. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Carrel v. LuxArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Davidson v. WeeArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Harmon v. SzramaArizona Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Chanay v. ChittendenArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Peery v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  3. Alaface v. National Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. Armco Steel Corp. v. Isaacson Structural Steel Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Courtesy Enterprises Inc. v. Richards LaboratoriesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API