Legal Opinion

State v. Pavelich

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1929No. 21235. En BancPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

These appellants were convicted of the crime of being jointists of an offense alleged to have been committed at a different time, but at the. same place as that alleged and involved in State v. Pavelich, 150 Wash. 411, 273 Pac. 182.

Unsuccessful motions were made by appellant Pavelich and Mason in arrest of judgment, and by ail of the appellants for a new trial.

The first error urged as a ground for reversal is that the court erred in failing and refusing to instruct the jury that no inference of guilt could be drawn from the failure of defendants to testify in the case. In this case, unlike…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Kilbourn v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Kring v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. GreshamWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ConnollySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  4. Johns v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Larson v. Union Investment & Loan Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API