Legal Opinion

State v. Gresham

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 2012No. Nos. 84148-9; 84150-1PublishedCited by 198 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

¶1 Roger Schemer and Michael Gresham were separately charged with child molestation. At trial, relying on the recently enacted RCW 10.58.090, the State successfully introduced evidence that Schemer and Gresham had previously committed sex offenses against other children. In Schemer’s case, King County Superior Court ruled that evidence of his prior acts of molestation was also admissible for the purpose of demonstrating a common scheme or plan; in Gresham’s case, Snohomish County Superior Court held that evidence of Gresham’s prior conviction for second degree assault with sexual motivation…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Kring v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. State v. LoughWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. GoebelWashington Supreme Court · 1950

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by198 opinions

  1. People v. Watkins; People v. PullenMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Association of Washington Spirits & Wine Distributors v. Washington State Liquor Control BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. GundersonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. State Of Washington, V William Edward LundstromCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

193 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API