Legal Opinion
Reed v. Pfizer, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 14, 2012No. 10-CV-05356 (ENV)(RER)PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*573 MEMORANDUM & ORDER
VITALIANO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Brenda and Ronald Reed, citizens of West Virginia, commenced this action on November 19, 2010 seeking damages resulting from Ms. Reed’s ingestion of Lybrel, an oral contraceptive pill allegedly designed, developed, and sold by defendants Pfizer, Inc. (“Pfizer”) and Wyeth LLC (“Wyeth”). On January 20, 2011, defendants filed a letter requesting a premotion conference and permission to file a motion to dismiss. In that letter, defendants argued that plaintiffs’ complaint should be dismissed based on a failure to plead plausible claims. The…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- NewSpin Sports, LLC v. Arrow Electronics, IncorporatCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Oden v. Bos. Scientific Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Marshall v. Hyundai Motor AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Yates v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- DiBartolo v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.