Legal Opinion
Yates v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 11, 2015No. 15-3104PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.
Stephanie Yates experienced a stroke while using the ORTHO EVRA® birth control patch, and she now seeks to hold the designers and manufacturers of the patch liable. Yates appeals the district court’s award of summary judgment to defendants on all five of her claims. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
I
A
Yates brought suit against Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Alza Corporation, Johnson & Johnson *287Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C., and Johnson & Johnson (“defendants”) in the New…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Jessica Frye v. CSX Transp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Barbara Kaiser v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Marroquin v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Rita McDaniel v. Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Trejo v. Johnson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.