American Smelting & Refining Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMartiN, Presiding Judge
The merchandise involved in this case was invoiced and entered under the name of flue dust or arsenical flue dust. It is a fine powder containing arsenious acid, and is imported into this country as a material from which that substance may be produced.
It was assessed with duty at the rate of 15 per cent ad valorem as a nonenumerated manufactured article, under paragraph 385 of the tariff act of 1913. The importer protested, claiming free entry for the merchandise under the enumeration of arsenic or arsenious acid in paragraph 387, or as arsenic, sulphide of arsenic or orpiment *213under paragraph…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Standard Varnish Works v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1894
- O. G. Hempstead & Son v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
- United States v. Davies, Turner & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- Shallus v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland · 1907
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. Basket Importing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- American Smelting & Repining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Kamikawa Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Philipp Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Alpha Lux Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.