Legal Opinion

Hillman v. Hardwick

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1891PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from District Court, Bingham County. Priority in time of appropriation secures priority of right; or first in time is first in right. (11th Sess. Laws 1881, p. 267 ; Rev. Stats. 1887, sec. 3159.) A transfer of possession of land to purchaser transfers equitable title to the land; and the water right accustomed to be used with and for the benefit of the land passes as appurtenant to the land.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from District Court, Bingham County. Priority in time of appropriation secures priority of right; or first in time is first in right. (11th Sess. Laws 1881, p. 267 ; Rev. Stats. 1887, sec. 3159.) A transfer of possession of land to purchaser transfers equitable title to the land; and the water right accustomed to be used with and for the benefit of the land passes as appurtenant to the land. (Gave v. Grafts, 53 Cal. 138; Farmer v. Water Go., 56 Cal. 11; Tucker v. Jones, 8 Mont. 335, 19 Pae. 571; Geddis v. Parrish, 1 Wash. Ter. 587, 31 Pae. 314.) The capacity of a ditch is to be…

1Opinion of the CourtHuston, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment and decree of the district court for Bingham county, in an action by the plaintiff to establish his right to the waters of Gooseberry creek and its tributaries, and to restrain the defendants from interfering therewith. The case was heard upon pleadings and proofs before the court without a jury, and is brought here upon a statement of the case, containing all the evidence, the findings of the court and the decree and judgment. The plaintiff, and those under whom he claims, settled upon certain lands lying upon and along Gooseberry creek, in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Joyce Livestock Co. v. United StatesIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. McGinness v. StanfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Nordick v. SorensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Uhrig v. CoffinIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Mahoney v. NeiswangerIdaho Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API