Legal Opinion

Uhrig v. Coffin

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1952No. 7801PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIVENS, Chief Justice.

Appellant Beecher contracted to purchase a 240-acre farm from appellant Uhrig, and is now in possession thereof, and “appellant” as used hereafter will refer to appellant Beecher.

Respondents Lawsons own a 160-acre farm immediately north. Both farms are on the west side of and adjacent to Wood River, shortly above Stanton’s Crossing.

Respondents Coffin and Kulp are parties pro forma, merely because of their respective official positions.

The Frost Decree, December 13, 1909, adjudicating the waters of Wood River, gave appellant’s lands 180 inches, priority June 1, 1884, and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Allen v. PetrickMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Barnes v. SabronNevada Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Union Mill & Mining Co. v. DangbergU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
  4. Department of Finance v. Union Pacific RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Washington State Sugar Co. v. GoodrichIdaho Supreme Court · 1915

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. R.D. Merrill Co. v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation District, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Lobdell v. State Ex Rel. Board of Highway DirectorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Payette Farms Co. v. ConterIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. A & B Irrigation District v. Idaho Conservation LeagueIdaho Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API