Legal Opinion

Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1978No. 45027PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

This is a direct appeal by the State of Washington, Department of Revenue, from the trial court's ruling that the levy of tax on the use of respondent's airplane in this state was not permitted by either the applicable state statute (RCW 82.12) or the United States Constitution. We affirm.

Respondent, Pope & Talbot, Inc., a foreign corporation with head offices in Portland, Oregon, owns several facilities in Washington, including a sawmill, a resort and a tree farm. On October 6, 1971, it purchased an airplane in Oregon at a purchase price of $95,000. No sales or use tax was paid to Oregon or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Minnesota v. BlasiusSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Garrison v. Washington State Nursing BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Vita Food Products, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. TheilkenWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. CainCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  4. City of Seattle v. Auto Sheet Metal Workers Local 387Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  5. Rainier Bancorporation v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API