Legal Opinion

State v. Theilken

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1984No. 50399-1PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

The issue presented in this case is whether the firearm and deadly weapon sentence enhancement provisions found in RCW 9.41.025 and RCW 9.95.040 may be applied to an unintentional crime such as first degree manslaughter. We hold that those provisions may be so applied.

I

On February 16, 1983, Larry Wilmorath died as a result of a gunshot wound to the head. Respondent herein, Charles Bernard Theilken, was charged by information with the crime of manslaughter in the first degree — RCW 9A.32.060(l)(a). The information also contained allegations that, at the time of the events, respondent was armed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Paulson v. County of PierceWashington Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and ParolesWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Multicare Medical Center v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. StandiferWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Allan v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API