Rainier Bancorporation v. Department of Revenue
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.
The sole question is whether Rainier Bancorporation (Rainier) may deduct the income received "from investments and the use of money as such" from the amount to be paid under the Business and Occupation (B *671& O) tax. We hold that under RCW 82.04.430(1) Rainier is engaged in a "financial business" and thus is ineligible for the statutory deduction.
Rainier is a bank holding company registered with the Governors of the Federal Reserve System pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, 12 U.S.C. § 1844. It has three wholly owned subsidiaries: Rainier Bank, Rainier Mortgage Company and Rainier…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- John H. Sellen Construction Co. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Evergreen-Washelli Memorial Park Co. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1978
3Cited by8 opinions
- Simpson Inv. Co. v. State, Dept. of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Simpson Investment Co. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Simpson Investment Co. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Browning v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.