Legal Opinion
Vasiliy Ostapovich Romanishyn v. Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 20, 2006No. 05-3141PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARTH, Circuit Judge.
Does the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) allow an alien who entered the country as a refugee, and subsequently adjusted his status to become a lawful permanent resident (“LPR”), to be placed in removal proceedings although the Attorney General never terminated his refugee status pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1157(c)(4)? We conclude that it does.
Because we answer that question in the affirmative — and because we conclude that the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) in this case did not violate petitioner’s due process rights by limiting the number of witnesses he could call to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Aysar Abdulrahman v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Adel Fadlala Jarbough v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Rafael Guerrero-Sanchez v. Warden York County PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Edna Toussaint v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Khouzam v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Castro v. Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.