Legal Opinion
Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Abudu
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 1, 1988No. 86-1128PublishedCited by 1,307 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
Regulations promulgated by the Attorney General authorize deportable aliens to file motions to reopen their deportation proceedings to' request asylum on the basis of newly discovered evidence. Denials of such motions are subject to judicial review in the United States courts of appeals. The question in this case is whether those courts should review such Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denials under an abuse-of-discretion standard, as petitioner contends, or under the strict standard that would be applied when passing on a motion for summary judgment, as the Court of Appeals held. 802 F.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,307 opinions
- Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Jian Hui Shao v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Kucana v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
1,302 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.