Legal Opinion
Castro v. Attorney General of United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 14, 2012No. 10-3234PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
POLLAK, District Judge.
Jose Castro, a citizen of Costa Rica, challenges a determination by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) that he is inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii), which provides that “[a]ny alien who falsely represents, or has falsely represented, himself or herself to be a citizen of the United States for any purpose or benefit under this chapter (including section 1824a of this title) or any other Federal or State law is inadmissible.” We conclude that the statute does…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Jian Lian Guo v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- David Diaz-Jimenez v. Jefferson Sessions, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- RICHMONDBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2016
- Bernardo Castillo v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Richmond v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Pankajkumar S. Patel v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.